Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reauthorizes federal funding for the Historic Preservation Fund to protect and restore historic buildings and sites.
The problem
The Historic Preservation Fund, which helps states and tribes protect historic buildings and archaeological sites, needs renewed congressional authorization and funding to continue operations.
The proposal
The bill reauthorizes the Historic Preservation Fund, allowing it to continue receiving federal appropriations to support historic preservation projects across states and tribal lands.
The impact
Affects state historic preservation offices, tribal nations, property owners, archaeologists, and communities with historic sites seeking federal funding for restoration and protection projects.
Protects historic buildings, sites, and archaeological resources that tell America's story. Helps maintain cultural landmarks for future generations to learn from and enjoy.
Historic preservation projects create jobs in construction, restoration, and tourism. Communities with preserved historic sites often attract visitors and businesses, boosting local economies.
Reusing and restoring existing buildings uses fewer new materials than demolition and new construction. Preserving older buildings reduces landfill waste and environmental damage.
Provides funding for tribes to protect their cultural heritage, sacred sites, and archaeological resources. Supports tribal sovereignty in preserving their own histories.
Reauthorizing the fund requires continued federal taxpayer funding during a time of budget constraints. Some argue resources should prioritize other national priorities.
Historic preservation funding might flow more easily to wealthy communities with established preservation programs and connections. Lower-income communities may receive less support.
Historic designations on private properties can limit owners' ability to modify or develop their buildings. Some property owners view this as reducing their rights and property values.
Limited evidence about whether the fund's spending always produces meaningful economic or cultural results. Some projects may not deliver promised community benefits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.