Latest action: Held at the desk.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Richard Durbin (D-IL)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill establishing penalties and enforcement measures related to defiance of federal authority.
The problem
Current laws may lack sufficient mechanisms to address defiance of federal orders, court rulings, or law enforcement directives in certain situations.
The proposal
Creates new criminal penalties and enforcement procedures for individuals or entities that defy federal authority, potentially including increased criminal charges and enforcement tools.
The impact
Federal law enforcement, individuals charged under new provisions, state/local governments coordinating with federal authorities, and anyone subject to federal orders or court directives.
May enhance law enforcement's ability to enforce federal orders and court decisions. Could deter non-compliance with federal directives. Provides clearer legal framework for federal-level enforcement.
Reinforces the authority of federal courts and legal proceedings. Could increase respect for court orders. Helps ensure judicial decisions are followed.
Establishes uniform standards for addressing defiance of federal authority. Reduces ambiguity in enforcement actions. Creates predictable legal consequences.
New penalties could affect free speech or protest rights if broadly applied. May chill legitimate civilian dissent or peaceful resistance. Could be interpreted to criminalize protected activities.
Without clear bill language, 'defiance' could be defined too broadly. May lead to inconsistent or unfair enforcement. Could penalize citizens for innocent misunderstandings.
May override state and local authority in some cases. Could create conflicts between federal and state law enforcement. Raises concerns about proper balance of powers.
Adds new criminal penalties that could increase incarceration rates. May disproportionately affect certain populations. Could burden already-full prison systems.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.