Latest action: Held at the desk.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Thomas Tillis (R-NC)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill to enhance tracking and enforcement tools for crime investigation.
The problem
Law enforcement agencies need better tools to track suspects and gather evidence in criminal investigations efficiently and effectively.
The proposal
The bill expands authority and resources for law enforcement to use advanced tracking and investigative techniques in criminal cases.
The impact
Law enforcement gains new investigative tools; individuals may face expanded surveillance authority in criminal investigations.
Enhanced tracking tools could help law enforcement solve crimes faster and catch dangerous criminals. Better investigative capabilities may lead to higher conviction rates and safer communities.
Advanced tools could help police departments work more efficiently with existing budgets. Agencies could focus resources on serious crimes rather than manual tracking methods.
Better tracking capabilities may help law enforcement protect crime victims and prevent repeat offenses. Quick apprehension of suspects could reduce harm to potential future victims.
Expanded tracking authority could impact regular citizens' privacy rights if not carefully limited. Surveillance tools might be used beyond their intended crime-fighting purpose.
Without strong oversight, investigative tools could be abused or applied unfairly to certain groups. Law enforcement discretion in using these tools could lead to discriminatory practices.
New tracking systems and training require significant government spending. Smaller police departments may struggle to afford or implement these new technologies.
Expanded surveillance authority may conflict with Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches. Courts might challenge certain tracking methods as unconstitutional.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.