Latest action: Held at the desk.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Ted Cruz (R-TX)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
A resolution to reject the FCC's E-Rate program rule for reducing internet access gaps.
The problem
The FCC created a rule to expand the E-Rate program, which provides internet access to schools and libraries. Some lawmakers oppose this rule.
The proposal
This resolution would cancel the FCC's E-Rate program rule using congressional disapproval authority.
The impact
Schools and libraries might lose expanded internet funding. Students without home internet could face educational challenges.
The resolution asserts Congress's authority to review and reject agency rules. This upholds the principle that elected officials should approve major policy changes rather than unelected agencies acting alone.
Rejecting the rule prevents potential spending increases to the E-Rate program. This could preserve federal funds for other priorities or reduce government spending.
Canceling the rule returns broadband policy decisions to states and local communities. Local leaders may prefer tailoring solutions to their specific needs rather than federal mandates.
Rejecting the rule eliminates expanded internet funding for schools and libraries. Students without home internet, especially in rural or poor areas, may fall further behind in remote learning.
Rural schools and libraries rely heavily on E-Rate funding for broadband. Rejecting the expansion disproportionately harms students in areas where internet is expensive or unavailable.
Limited internet access reduces educational opportunities and workforce readiness. This weakens America's ability to compete globally as students miss digital skills development.
Libraries and schools provide crucial internet access for telehealth, job searching, and government services. Limiting their broadband capabilities reduces public access to essential resources.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.