Latest action: Received in the Senate.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Bryan Steil (R-WI)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Allow Capitol Police officers to work longer before retiring.
The problem
Capitol Police officers may need to work past current retirement age limits to maintain adequate staffing and security operations.
The proposal
Amends federal law to permit increasing the retirement age for United States Capitol Police officers beyond current requirements.
The impact
Capitol Police officers face potential longer work careers. The Capitol Police workforce may gain experienced personnel. Retirement benefits timing changes for affected officers.
Allowing older officers to continue working keeps experienced personnel on the job. This maintains institutional knowledge and leadership on the force.
Longer work careers help fill staffing needs without immediately hiring and training new officers. This can improve security continuity at the Capitol.
Delaying retirements may reduce immediate pension payouts and hiring/training costs. This could save taxpayer money in the short term.
Officers who want to work longer get that option. This provides flexibility for those needing additional income before retirement.
Younger officers may wait longer for promotions when senior officers work past normal retirement. This could hurt recruitment and retention of new talent.
Police work is physically demanding. Requiring or pressuring officers to work longer could increase injuries, stress, and health problems.
Different retirement rules for Capitol Police versus other federal employees raises fairness questions. It may create inconsistency in retirement policy.
The bill provides no summary explaining why this change is needed. Without clear justification, the actual problem remains unclear.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.