Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Allows federal law enforcement officers to purchase their service weapons when leaving the job.
The problem
Federal law enforcement officers cannot easily buy their issued weapons after retirement or separation from service, unlike some state and local officers who have this option.
The proposal
The bill permits federal law enforcement officers to purchase their service weapons at fair market value when they leave their agency, with proper vetting and background checks required.
The impact
Federal law enforcement officers gain the option to keep their service weapons; agencies must establish purchase procedures; taxpayers may see minor revenue changes from weapon sales.
Officers who trained extensively with their service weapons can keep them for personal use and security. This may improve morale and retention among federal law enforcement personnel. It recognizes officers' familiarity with equipment they've relied on professionally.
Federal agencies could generate revenue by selling weapons to departing officers at fair market prices. This creates a new income stream for agencies that might support operations or reduce costs elsewhere.
Many state and local law enforcement agencies already allow officers to purchase service weapons. Federal policy alignment could reduce complexity and provide parity across different law enforcement levels.
Using existing background check systems ensures weapons transfer to screened individuals. The requirement for fair market value prevents underpricing and maintains proper record-keeping.
More firearms in private hands, even if screened, increases potential for misuse or theft. Former officers separating due to misconduct could obtain weapons if background checks miss issues.
Federal agencies must create new systems to evaluate fair market value, process purchases, and maintain records. This adds compliance costs and requires trained staff to administer the program.
The bill doesn't clarify which officers qualify, how separations are handled, or what happens with officers fired for cause. These gaps could create legal disputes and enforcement challenges.
Federal service weapons are military-grade and highly sought. Allowing their private sale could increase access to these weapons in unauthorized channels through theft or illegal resale.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.