Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Improves the federal cybersecurity scholarship program to train more Americans for cyber jobs.
The problem
The U.S. faces a shortage of cybersecurity workers. The Cyber Scholarship for Service Program needs updates to better prepare students for these critical jobs.
The proposal
The bill amends the 2014 Cybersecurity Enhancement Act to improve the Federal Cyber Scholarship for Service Program with better training and support for participants.
The impact
Students pursuing cybersecurity careers benefit from improved scholarships. Federal agencies gain access to trained cybersecurity workers. Technology sector addresses workforce shortages.
The U.S. has thousands of unfilled cybersecurity jobs. More trained workers help protect government and private systems from attacks. Strengthening this program directly fills a critical national need.
Scholarships help lower-income students enter well-paying tech careers. Participants gain practical skills while getting education paid for. This creates pathways to middle-class jobs.
Better-trained cybersecurity professionals protect government networks and data. Cybersecurity incidents cost billions and threaten public safety. Investing in trained workers reduces these risks.
Cybersecurity is a growing industry creating new jobs. Training workers in this field supports economic development. Companies benefit from accessing skilled American workers.
Expanding scholarships requires federal funding. This adds to government budget costs. Taxpayers fund programs even if they don't directly benefit.
Scholarship programs often require service commitments to government. Details about length and location of required service are unknown. This may limit student flexibility.
The bill summary is vague about specific improvements planned. Without knowing exact changes, it's hard to assess full impact. More transparency would help evaluate the proposal.
Tech companies also compete for cybersecurity talent by offering high salaries. Government programs may struggle to retain workers long-term. Private sector jobs may pull trained workers away.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.