Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
HR 9515 requires multi-factor authentication security measures for health data systems.
The problem
Health information systems face cyber threats and data breaches that compromise patient privacy and sensitive medical records.
The proposal
The bill mandates multi-factor authentication for accessing health information systems to strengthen security protections.
The impact
Healthcare providers, patients, and health IT companies must implement stronger security requirements for protecting medical information.
Multi-factor authentication adds extra security layers that make it harder for hackers to access patient medical records. This protects sensitive health information from theft or misuse.
Requiring MFA significantly decreases the chance that stolen passwords alone can compromise health systems. This lowers costs from security breaches and legal liability.
Many health organizations already use MFA for security. Making it mandatory creates consistent protections across all providers rather than leaving some vulnerable.
Seniors and vulnerable patients are often targets for medical identity theft. Stronger authentication helps protect these groups from fraud and unauthorized access.
Small clinics and rural hospitals may struggle to afford new MFA technology and staff training. Compliance expenses could burden limited budgets.
Extra authentication steps could slow down emergency care or telehealth visits. Patients might experience longer wait times for urgent medical services.
Some older health systems may face difficulties integrating MFA technology. Implementation could be challenging and require significant system upgrades.
Patients accessing their own health records online would need to manage additional authentication methods. This creates inconvenience for managing personal health information.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.