Latest action: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 35 - 0.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Requires companies to tell the truth when using AI to advertise or communicate with consumers.
The problem
Companies may use AI to create fake videos, fake testimonials, or misleading content to trick people into buying products or services.
The proposal
The bill requires AI-generated ads and communications to be clearly labeled. It gives regulators power to punish companies that deceive consumers with AI.
The impact
Consumers gain protection from fake AI content. Companies must change how they advertise. Advertisers and tech firms must follow new rules.
People won't be tricked by fake AI videos or fake customer reviews. Consumers can make smarter buying choices when they know content is AI-made.
Clear labeling helps people understand when AI is being used. This can make people more comfortable using AI products in the future.
Honest companies won't lose customers to competitors using deceptive AI tricks. All businesses follow the same rules.
Government agencies can punish companies that break the rules. This deters companies from using AI dishonestly.
Companies must spend money to label AI content and check their ads. Small companies might struggle with these new requirements.
The bill may not clearly define what counts as deceptive AI. Companies might be confused about what they can and cannot do.
Companies might use AI less if they worry about breaking new rules. This could slow down beneficial AI development.
AI technology changes fast. It may be difficult for regulators to keep up and catch all deceptive uses.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.