Latest action: Subcommittee Hearings Held
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Austin Scott (R-GA)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Redesignates Ocmulgee Mounds as a national park instead of a national monument.
The problem
Ocmulgee Mounds currently has national monument status. This bill would change its official designation to national park status, which may provide different protections and management authorities.
The proposal
The bill redesignates Ocmulgee Mounds National Monument as Ocmulgee Mounds National Park, changing its federal management and protection status.
The impact
Native American communities, local residents, park visitors, and federal land management agencies would experience changes in how the site is managed and protected.
National park designation typically provides stronger legal protections than monument status. This could better preserve the site's cultural and archaeological resources for future generations.
National parks often receive more consistent federal funding and resources than monuments. This could improve visitor facilities, research programs, and site maintenance.
Park status acknowledges the site's importance to Native American tribes and American history. It elevates the site's profile for educational and cultural purposes.
National park status comes with established management policies and procedures. This provides consistent long-term stewardship of the archaeological and cultural site.
Park status might lead to stricter regulations on public access or activities. Local communities could face new limitations on traditional land use practices.
National park management involves more complex federal procedures than monument management. This could slow decision-making and create administrative challenges.
Park designation places more authority with federal agencies rather than local governments. Local communities may have less influence over site management decisions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.