Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bans PFAS chemicals in cosmetics and personal care products sold in the United States.
The problem
PFAS chemicals in cosmetics may accumulate in human bodies and the environment. These substances resist breaking down and are linked to potential health concerns.
The proposal
The bill prohibits manufacturers from using PFAS compounds in cosmetic and personal care products. It establishes rules for what companies can sell to American consumers.
The impact
Cosmetic companies must reformulate products. Consumers may have fewer product options. Manufacturers face compliance costs and timeline adjustments for product lines.
Reduces exposure to PFAS chemicals that can accumulate in the body over time. Many other countries have already restricted these substances in cosmetics.
Prevents PFAS from entering water supplies and ecosystems where they persist indefinitely. These chemicals contaminate soil and groundwater globally.
Aligns U.S. standards with Europe and other regions that restrict PFAS. Creates uniform rules across the cosmetics industry instead of state-by-state variation.
Pushes companies to develop safer alternative chemicals and formulations. May create opportunities for new product development and market advantages.
Reformulating cosmetics with alternative ingredients may raise manufacturing costs. These expenses could be passed to consumers through higher prices.
Some specialty and performance products may become unavailable while companies develop alternatives. Consumers may lose preferred product options temporarily.
Small cosmetics makers may lack resources for rapid reformulation compared to large companies. Compliance costs could disadvantage smaller manufacturers.
Benefits depend on enforcement and actual industry compliance with deadlines. Environmental impact may take years to become measurable.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.