Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prohibits fencing construction at Lafayette Square near the White House.
The problem
Lafayette Square has been modified with fencing installations. Some groups want to restrict future fencing at this historic public space near the President's residence.
The proposal
The bill prevents the installation or maintenance of permanent fencing structures at Lafayette Square, likely requiring removal of existing barriers.
The impact
Affects security operations, public access to the square, and National Park Service management of this central Washington DC landmark.
Removing fencing could allow more citizens to access Lafayette Square freely. This historic park would become more open to the public for gatherings and peaceful assembly.
Lafayette Square is a historic location where many important events occurred. Keeping it unfenced maintains its character as an accessible public space.
An unfenced square enables citizens to gather and protest more easily. This supports First Amendment activities in a symbolic location near government.
Removing fencing reduces barriers protecting the White House and surrounding area. This could create security challenges for law enforcement protecting the President and federal buildings.
Without fencing, controlling large crowds becomes harder during protests or events. Park management may struggle to direct foot traffic and prevent disruptions.
The bill may limit the National Park Service's ability to manage emergencies or maintain order. Permanent fencing restrictions could hamper responses to future security threats.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.