Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes Civil War Defenses of Washington as a national historical park.
The problem
Historic Civil War defensive structures around Washington, D.C. need better preservation and public recognition as a unified national site.
The proposal
Creates a new national historical park to protect and interpret Civil War era fortifications and defensive positions around Washington, D.C.
The impact
Park visitors, historians, and local communities gain improved access to Civil War sites. Federal government manages additional land and resources.
Establishes formal protection for Civil War fortifications and structures. Ensures consistent funding and professional management. Makes important history available to future generations.
Provides accessible location for students and visitors to learn about Civil War history. Can attract tourists and support local economies through park visits.
Consolidates scattered Civil War sites under one national park system. Improves visitor experience and educational coordination across the region.
Recognizes local historical significance and heritage. Strengthens regional identity around shared history.
Government may need to purchase private land or pay compensation. Ongoing park operations require taxpayer funding indefinitely.
Landowners may lose development rights or face land acquisition efforts. Local zoning and use could be restricted.
National Park Service must allocate resources to maintain new site. May divert funding from existing parks or programs.
Bill lacks detail on specific lands included or exact scope. Unclear how existing Civil War sites will be incorporated.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.