Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes accountability measures for federal public service employees.
The problem
Concerns exist about federal employee accountability, performance standards, and responsiveness to oversight. This bill addresses perceived gaps in how government workers are evaluated and held responsible.
The proposal
Creates new accountability requirements and oversight mechanisms for federal employees in the executive branch. Establishes standards for performance evaluation and consequences for non-compliance.
The impact
Federal employees face new accountability standards. Oversight committees gain additional authority. Government agencies must implement new procedures. Citizens may see changes in federal service delivery.
Strengthens oversight of federal employees and agencies. Creates clearer standards for performance and conduct. May improve responsiveness to public concerns and congressional oversight.
Establishes clearer expectations for federal workers. May improve work quality and efficiency. Creates measurable benchmarks for evaluating employee performance.
Gives Congress more tools to monitor federal agencies. Increases transparency in government operations. May prevent wasteful spending and misconduct.
Demonstrating accountability may improve citizen confidence in federal institutions. Shows responsiveness to oversight concerns. Creates mechanisms for addressing public complaints.
Implementing new accountability systems requires resources and staff time. May increase administrative costs for government operations. Could divert attention from core government functions.
Strict accountability measures might discourage people from pursuing federal careers. Could reduce willingness to take initiative or make difficult decisions. May harm employee morale.
Bill provides limited specifics on how accountability measures will work. Agencies may struggle with unclear requirements. Inconsistent implementation across government is possible.
Enhanced oversight powers could be misused for partisan purposes. May target employees based on politics rather than actual performance. Could undermine civil service protections.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10
Reserved for the Speaker.
HR 2
Reserved for the Speaker.
HRES 1530
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 9576) to establish the National Fraud Enforcement Division of the Department of Justice; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 10326) to enhance information-sharing capabilities between Federal law enforcement and State agencies to detect, investigate, and prosecute fraud in certain Federal programs, and to protect individual privacy; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 210) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth; Notice of Decision''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 213) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the ‘‘California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Commercial Harbor Craft Regulations; Notice of Decision''; and providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 5334) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood educators to take the educator expense deduction, and for other purposes.
HR 10204
Legislative Branch Agencies Clarification Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.