Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
H. Griffith (R-VA)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Clarifies which federal agencies belong to the legislative branch of government.
The problem
Confusion exists about which agencies are part of Congress versus the executive branch, creating legal and administrative uncertainty about agency oversight and authority.
The proposal
The bill defines and clarifies which federal agencies should be classified as legislative branch agencies rather than executive branch agencies.
The impact
Congress, federal agencies, and courts will have clearer rules about which agencies report to Congress and how they operate independently.
Clear definitions help courts and agencies understand who has authority over what. This makes laws easier to follow and apply fairly. Less confusion means fewer legal disputes.
Clarifying legislative branch agencies gives Congress better control over its own operations. Congress can more effectively oversee agencies that work for it. This supports checks and balances in government.
When roles are clear, agencies operate more smoothly. Workers know who they report to and what their job is. Clear rules reduce confusion and wasted time.
Keeps Congress's agencies separate from presidential control. This ensures Congress stays independent from the executive branch. Supports the separation of powers in government.
If agencies move from executive to legislative branch, the President has less control over their operations. This could make coordinating government policy harder. The executive branch might struggle to implement its programs.
Moving agencies between branches might spark disagreements about authority and control. Congress and the President could fight over agency decisions. These disputes might end up in court, costing time and money.
Without seeing the specific agencies affected, it is hard to predict real consequences. Different changes for different agencies could create inconsistent effects. The actual impact depends on which agencies are reclassified.
Moving agencies might make it harder to hold someone responsible for problems. Congress has many members; the President is one person. Diffused authority could mean nobody is clearly accountable.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10
Reserved for the Speaker.
HR 2
Reserved for the Speaker.
HRES 1530
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 9576) to establish the National Fraud Enforcement Division of the Department of Justice; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 10326) to enhance information-sharing capabilities between Federal law enforcement and State agencies to detect, investigate, and prosecute fraud in certain Federal programs, and to protect individual privacy; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 210) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth; Notice of Decision''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 213) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the ‘‘California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Commercial Harbor Craft Regulations; Notice of Decision''; and providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 5334) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood educators to take the educator expense deduction, and for other purposes.
HR 9342
GPO Modernization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.