Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Increases funding for free tax help clinics serving low-income Americans.
The problem
Low-income families struggle to afford tax preparation services. Free legal tax clinics help but need more resources to serve more people.
The proposal
The bill increases federal funding for Low-Income Taxpayer Clinics (LITCs) that provide free tax assistance and representation to low-income individuals.
The impact
Low-income taxpayers gain better access to free tax help. Clinics can serve more people. Reduces tax filing errors and improves compliance.
Free tax clinics help poor and working families file taxes correctly and get refunds they deserve. Better access means fewer mistakes and more money back in families' pockets.
Clinics help disadvantaged people navigate complex tax rules. This creates a more level playing field between wealthy people with accountants and poor people without resources.
Better tax filing compliance and fewer errors can result in accurate payments. However, revenue effects depend on how many people are served and what they owe.
Free clinics handle routine tax help and representation, freeing up IRS resources for other work. This improves overall tax system efficiency.
The bill uses taxpayer money to fund clinics. This adds to federal budget costs during a time of large deficits. Opponents worry about growing government spending.
Clinics may not reach everyone who needs help. Funding increases might not be enough to serve all low-income families. Results depend on how much money Congress actually provides.
Expanding clinics requires hiring staff, training workers, and setting up offices. Execution delays could prevent people from getting help when they need it.
The bill's actual impact depends on specific funding amounts, which are not detailed. Results may vary by region based on clinic capacity and volunteer availability.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.