Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bans a specific abortion procedure called dilation and extraction.
The problem
Some states and advocacy groups oppose dilation and extraction procedures in abortion, viewing them as harmful to the fetus.
The proposal
This bill would prohibit doctors from performing dilation and extraction abortions nationwide, with limited exceptions for maternal health emergencies.
The impact
Affects pregnant women seeking abortions, healthcare providers performing procedures, and abortion access depending on state law interpretation.
Reflects views of those who oppose certain abortion methods. Supporters believe it protects what they consider vulnerable life. Creates uniform federal standard across states.
Could lead to increased use of different abortion methods or earlier procedures. May push women toward earlier-stage abortions when available.
Several states have already passed similar bans. Federal version creates consistent rules nationwide instead of patchwork state laws.
Restricts doctors' ability to use procedures they may consider safest for specific cases. Can limit flexibility in treating complicated pregnancies or health situations.
Those who believe abortion decisions belong to women and doctors oppose federal restrictions. Creates constitutional questions about federal versus individual state power.
Could require investigations into private medical decisions. Raises privacy concerns and questions about how violations would be proven and prosecuted.
Medical organizations sometimes differ on which procedures are appropriate. Federal ban limits doctors' judgment based on individual patient needs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.