Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, the Judiciary, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents federal officials from profiting off their government service after leaving office.
The problem
Former public officials may profit from their government experience through speaking fees, consulting, or book deals. This raises concerns about conflicts of interest and whether officials make decisions based on future earnings rather than public good.
The proposal
The bill likely restricts former federal employees and officials from receiving certain payments or engaging in activities that capitalize on their government positions within a specified timeframe after leaving office.
The impact
Federal employees, former officials, and their potential business partners would face new restrictions on post-government income. Citizens may see reduced concerns about official conflicts of interest, though enforcement and scope remain unclear.
Officials may make better decisions if they cannot profit from their government connections later. This could increase public trust that decisions are based on what is best for citizens, not personal financial gain.
High-ranking officials currently have major advantages in earning money after government service. Restrictions could prevent wealthy, connected individuals from gaining extra income advantages.
Clear rules about post-government activities set a strong ethical standard for public service. This can strengthen public confidence that government works for citizens, not for officials' future profits.
Preventing officials from speaking or consulting may violate First Amendment rights and limit career opportunities. People leaving government service have reduced freedom to earn a living using their expertise.
Talented people might avoid government jobs if they cannot earn money from their expertise afterward. This could reduce the quality of people willing to serve in federal positions.
Monitoring all former officials' activities and income sources is expensive and difficult. The government would need new enforcement resources to track violations effectively.
The bill's title does not explain what counts as 'profiting' or how long restrictions last. Vague rules create uncertainty for former officials and potential legal challenges.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.