Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill addresses concerns about Chinese Communist Party influence in America.
The problem
Concerns exist about potential Chinese government influence on Americans through various channels including research, technology, and educational institutions.
The proposal
Bill likely proposes measures to counter alleged CCP influence, though specific details are unavailable as it remains in committee without official summary.
The impact
Could affect researchers, universities, technology companies, and Chinese nationals in US if enacted, depending on final provisions.
Addressing foreign government influence protects American institutions and research from potential espionage or coercion. This could strengthen defenses against unwanted foreign interference in sensitive sectors.
Ensuring universities operate freely without foreign government pressure supports academic freedom and American research integrity. This protects the independence of American educational institutions.
Monitoring technology sector vulnerabilities could prevent foreign government access to sensitive American innovations and data. This protects competitive advantages in critical technologies.
Aggressive measures against Chinese influence could strain US-China relations and trigger retaliation. This might harm American businesses and diplomatic relationships.
Policies could unfairly target Chinese nationals or Americans of Chinese descent if not carefully designed. This raises civil rights concerns about equal treatment.
Restricting international research partnerships could slow scientific progress and innovation in America. Universities and companies benefit from global collaboration.
Without a detailed summary, unclear what specific actions bill requires and how agencies will enforce them. This creates uncertainty for affected organizations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.