Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reauthorizes a special postage stamp that funds breast cancer research.
The problem
The current breast cancer research stamp program is expiring and needs to be renewed to continue funding research into prevention and treatment.
The proposal
The bill extends the breast cancer research stamp program, allowing the postal service to continue selling special stamps with proceeds going to breast cancer research.
The impact
Breast cancer researchers receive continued funding. Stamp buyers support research. The postal service administers the program with oversight.
The stamp program funds breast cancer research without requiring taxpayer money. It allows people to voluntarily contribute to research when buying stamps.
People choose to buy the stamp if they want to help. There is no government mandate or requirement involved.
The stamp program has already been operating successfully. Reauthorizing it continues an established way of funding research.
Stamp sales may not generate large amounts of money compared to other funding sources. The program's impact on actual research might be modest.
The bill summary lacks details about how funds are distributed and monitored. More information is needed about accountability.
This approach relies on voluntary purchases rather than direct government funding. Direct appropriations might provide more reliable, larger amounts for research.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.