Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill adds hazard pay for federal workers doing prescribed burns.
The problem
Federal employees who conduct prescribed burns face dangerous working conditions but may not receive adequate hazard compensation for this risky work.
The proposal
Amends federal law to provide hazard pay to government workers who carry out prescribed burns as part of forest management.
The impact
Federal firefighters and land management employees receive additional pay for dangerous prescribed burn work. Affects Department of Interior and Forest Service operations.
Prescribed burns are dangerous work that can injure or kill workers. Hazard pay acknowledges this serious risk and shows government values worker safety.
Better pay for hazardous duties could attract more qualified workers to prescribed burn programs. This supports forest management and wildfire prevention efforts.
Hazard pay helps retain experienced workers in dangerous roles. Keeping trained personnel reduces mistakes and improves safety during burns.
Prescribed burns reduce fuel buildup that causes dangerous wildfires. Better pay encourages more prescribed burns, helping protect communities and forests.
Adding hazard pay increases federal spending on forest management and land agencies. This requires more budget funding during tight fiscal times.
The bill lacks details about which workers qualify, how much hazard pay applies, or which agencies are covered. This vagueness could cause confusion in implementation.
If hazard pay is uneven across agencies or regions, it could create fairness problems. Some workers doing similar dangerous work might receive different pay.
No official summary exists for this bill, making it difficult to assess full impacts. More details are needed to evaluate effectiveness.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.