Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires federal contractors to pay employees a higher minimum wage.
The problem
Federal contractors may pay workers less than advocates believe is fair or sufficient for living expenses.
The proposal
Establishes a minimum wage requirement that federal contractors must follow when paying their employees.
The impact
Federal contractors and their workers are affected. Workers may earn more; contractors may face higher labor costs.
Federal contractor employees would receive higher pay, which could help them afford housing, food, and other necessities. This may reduce financial stress for workers.
Setting a minimum wage for federal contractors could decrease the gap between low-paid and higher-paid workers. It promotes fairer pay across the federal workforce.
Workers with higher wages typically spend more money locally. This can boost small businesses and local economies where federal contractors operate.
Federal contractor wage standards may encourage private companies to raise their wages too. This could improve working conditions across industries.
Federal contractors must pay more for labor, which increases their business expenses. They may pass these costs to the government through higher contract prices.
Some contractors might hire fewer workers if labor costs rise significantly. This could limit job opportunities for some people seeking federal contract work.
Higher contractor wages mean higher costs for government contracts. Taxpayers may pay more for federal services and goods purchased through contractors.
Small businesses working with the federal government may struggle more than large contractors to absorb higher wage costs. This could disadvantage smaller companies.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1607
Expressing support for the designation of September 2026 as "National Workforce Development Month".
HR 10703
Protecting Workers’ Benefits Act
S 5615
VEST Act
S 5646
Direct Seller and Real Estate Agent Harmonization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.