Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reduces penalties for damaging U.S. government property.
The problem
Current federal law sets penalties for damaging U.S. property. This bill would lower those penalties for certain damage cases.
The proposal
Decreases the threshold for what counts as damage to U.S. property and reduces associated criminal penalties in federal law.
The impact
Affects people charged with property damage against the government, law enforcement priorities, and federal property protection policies.
Lower penalties may prevent harsh sentences for minor property damage incidents. This could reduce overall prison populations and associated costs.
Aligning penalties more closely to damage amounts may create fairer punishments. Smaller damages would receive smaller sentences.
Lower threshold requirements may reduce resources spent prosecuting minor cases. Federal courts could focus on more serious crimes.
Reduced penalties may discourage compliance with federal property laws. Lower consequences could increase damage incidents.
The bill lacks specifics on new damage thresholds or penalty amounts. Vague language creates uncertainty for courts and prosecutors.
Lower penalties might encourage intentional property damage during protests or civil unrest. This could lead to more frequent incidents.
Most federal property damage cases involve substantial amounts. Lowering thresholds affects few cases, reducing budget impact.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.