Latest action: Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 463.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Christopher Smith (R-NJ)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Reauthorizes the Kay Hagan Tick Act to continue funding tick-borne disease research and prevention programs.
The problem
Tick-borne diseases like Lyme disease affect thousands of Americans annually. Research and prevention efforts need sustained federal funding to combat growing public health threats.
The proposal
Extends funding and authorization for the Kay Hagan Tick Act, which supports research, surveillance, and education programs related to tick-borne illnesses.
The impact
Researchers, public health agencies, and patients with tick-borne diseases benefit from continued funding. States and communities gain resources for tick prevention and disease monitoring.
Continued funding allows scientists to study tick-borne diseases and develop better treatments and prevention methods. This maintains progress on understanding Lyme disease and other tick infections.
Supports surveillance systems that track tick-borne disease cases across the country. Early detection helps prevent outbreaks and protects vulnerable populations.
Funds educational programs teaching people how to prevent tick bites and recognize disease symptoms. Informed communities can take protective measures.
Prevention and early treatment reduce healthcare costs associated with chronic tick-borne illnesses. Society saves money through better disease management.
Reauthorization requires taxpayer funding for research and programs. Some argue funds should come from existing budgets rather than new appropriations.
Tick-borne diseases are more common in certain regions. Funding may benefit some areas more than others, raising fairness questions.
Without specific funding amounts or timelines, it's unclear how effectively programs will be expanded. Results may vary by state and local capacity.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.