Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes mentorship and support programs to help new teachers succeed and stay in the profession.
The problem
New teachers often leave the profession early due to lack of support, training, and mentorship during their first years on the job.
The proposal
Creates mentorship programs pairing experienced teachers with beginning educators, provides training, and offers support to improve teacher retention rates.
The impact
Beginning teachers gain guidance and support; schools reduce turnover; experienced teachers take on mentoring roles; students benefit from more stable teaching staff.
Mentorship programs give beginning teachers experienced guidance, making them more confident and effective in classrooms. This support improves student learning outcomes and helps new teachers perform better.
Better support for new teachers means fewer leave the profession in their early years. This saves schools money on hiring and training new staff repeatedly.
When teachers stay longer, schools have more stable staff and consistent instruction. Students benefit from fewer classroom changes and stronger teacher-student relationships.
The program recognizes and uses the knowledge of veteran teachers by having them mentor newcomers. This can boost morale among experienced educators.
Creating mentorship programs and training requires substantial government spending. Schools and states must budget for program coordinators, training materials, and teacher time.
Experienced teachers take on mentoring duties on top of their regular teaching. This extra work could lead to burnout without proper compensation or class load reduction.
Without an official summary, the bill's specific requirements and how schools implement programs remain uncertain. This could lead to uneven quality across different districts.
While mentorship helps, retention depends on many factors including pay, working conditions, and teacher preferences. The program alone may not solve teacher shortages.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.