Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
The bill aims to improve suicide risk assessments to help prevent suicide deaths.
The problem
Suicide rates remain high. Better risk assessment methods could help identify and support people at higher risk of suicide.
The proposal
The bill would establish or improve personal risk assessment processes to identify suicide risk and potentially connect people with prevention resources.
The impact
Veterans, military personnel, and potentially other high-risk groups would be assessed for suicide risk to enable earlier intervention and support.
Better risk assessments could identify people in crisis before suicide attempts occur, allowing mental health professionals to provide timely support and resources. Early intervention is proven to reduce suicide deaths.
Veterans have higher suicide rates than the general population. Tailored assessments for military and veteran communities address a serious public health problem in these groups.
Systematic risk assessments create standardized approaches to suicide prevention. This helps ensure consistent, evidence-based care across different facilities and providers.
Preventing suicides through early intervention avoids costly emergency care and saves family and community resources. Prevention is more cost-effective than crisis treatment.
Collecting personal mental health information for risk assessments raises privacy questions. People may worry about how their sensitive mental health data is stored and used.
Creating effective assessment systems requires training, funding, and coordination across many facilities. Some providers may lack resources to implement new assessment requirements properly.
Risk assessments may incorrectly flag low-risk people as high-risk, causing unnecessary stress and stigma. Over-identification could strain mental health resources.
Without clear information about funding, implementation costs, and staffing requirements, the bill's actual effectiveness and feasibility remain uncertain.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.