Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires AI model developers to report to the Commerce Department.
The problem
AI systems are advancing rapidly with limited government oversight. Policymakers need information about powerful AI models to understand risks and ensure safety.
The proposal
AI model developers must submit reports to the Secretary of Commerce detailing their artificial intelligence systems, capabilities, and testing results.
The impact
AI companies must comply with reporting requirements. Government gains visibility into AI development. Consumers may benefit from safer AI systems through oversight.
Reporting requirements help officials understand AI risks before problems occur. This allows regulators to identify dangerous systems early. Better information leads to smarter policy decisions.
Reports could be made public, letting citizens know how AI is being developed. This increases accountability for companies building powerful systems.
Required reports create uniform information that regulators can compare across companies. This makes it easier to spot problems and trends in AI development.
U.S. government understanding of AI capabilities helps maintain technological leadership. Better data supports strategic decisions about AI innovation.
Companies must spend money and staff time creating detailed reports. Smaller AI startups may struggle more with these requirements than large corporations.
AI developers worry about sharing proprietary information that gives them competitive advantages. Companies may resist reporting details about their most advanced systems.
The bill lacks specific details about what exactly developers must report. Companies won't know exact compliance requirements until rules are written.
Reporting burdens could discourage companies from developing new AI systems. Compliance costs might slow the pace of beneficial AI research and development.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.