Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates an educational exchange program to improve manufacturing workforce training through international cooperation.
The problem
The U.S. manufacturing sector needs more skilled workers. Educational programs may lack international best practices and resources to train workers effectively.
The proposal
Establishes a new educational exchange program connecting American manufacturing education with international partners to share knowledge and strengthen workforce preparation.
The impact
Students, educators, manufacturers, and schools benefit through improved training. International partners gain exchange opportunities. Taxpayers fund the program.
Better training programs prepare more workers for manufacturing jobs. This helps fill job openings in the industry and supports economic growth. American companies become more competitive.
Exchange programs let educators learn best practices from other countries. Students gain international perspectives on manufacturing. Both American and international programs improve.
Educational partnerships strengthen diplomatic relationships. Collaborating on workforce development builds goodwill between nations. This can lead to broader cooperation.
A stronger manufacturing workforce attracts investment. Companies expand operations and hire more workers. Local economies grow from increased manufacturing activity.
The program requires taxpayer funding. The cost and long-term budget impact are unclear. This money could go to other priorities.
Without details, it is unclear how well the program works. Exchange programs may not reach workers who need training most. Results are hard to measure.
The bill summary is missing. Details about partners, scope, and implementation are unknown. This makes it hard to assess the full impact.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.