Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires government meetings to be open to the public with limited exceptions.
The problem
Government agencies sometimes hold closed meetings without public knowledge or participation, reducing transparency and citizen oversight of official decisions.
The proposal
Mandates government bodies conduct meetings openly, requires advance public notice, and limits closed sessions to specific circumstances like security or personnel matters.
The impact
Citizens gain access to government proceedings. Agencies face compliance requirements. Elected officials face increased public scrutiny during deliberations.
Open meetings allow citizens to observe how government decisions are made. This helps build trust in institutions and reduces suspicion of hidden agendas. Public oversight serves as a check on government power.
When meetings are open and publicized, more people can attend and understand government actions. Citizens gain opportunities to provide input before decisions are finalized. This makes government more responsive to community needs.
Open records of who voted how and what was discussed create a clear record of official actions. This makes it easier to hold officials responsible for their decisions and prevents improper favoritism.
Public transparency can reduce duplicate investigations and audits of government activities. When decisions are documented openly, agencies avoid redundant work and citizens better understand government operations.
Agencies must spend time arranging public meeting spaces, managing attendance, and preparing documentation. Compliance with notice requirements and record-keeping adds administrative costs and staff workload.
Publicizing some government discussions could expose sensitive security strategies or vulnerable infrastructure details. Criminals or hostile actors might exploit information shared in open meetings about security measures.
Officials may self-censor or avoid honest debate when they know everything is public and on record. This could lead to less effective decision-making as people avoid expressing unpopular views.
Open meetings discussing personnel matters could expose personal information about government workers. Employees might face harassment or discrimination based on information revealed in public meetings.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.