Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Legislation aimed at keeping children enrolled in school and addressing student absenteeism.
The problem
Student absenteeism affects academic achievement, school funding, and long-term outcomes. Schools struggle to keep students engaged and attending classes regularly.
The proposal
The bill likely proposes measures to reduce student absences and improve school attendance through incentives, support services, or accountability mechanisms.
The impact
Students, schools, parents, and educators are affected through changes to attendance policies, potential funding adjustments, and new support programs for struggling learners.
Regular school attendance correlates with better grades and test scores. Students who attend school consistently learn more material and develop stronger academic skills.
Students with good attendance are more likely to graduate and pursue higher education or careers. This can improve lifetime earnings and economic stability.
Many schools receive funding based on attendance. Keeping students in school protects education budgets and resources available to all students.
The bill may include services helping families overcome barriers to attendance like transportation or health issues. This supports vulnerable and low-income communities.
Tracking attendance and student behavior may raise concerns about data collection and privacy. Parents might worry about government oversight of family decisions.
Families facing homelessness, health crises, or transportation problems may be penalized. The bill could burden struggling families without addressing root causes.
Schools may need more staff and money to enforce attendance policies and provide support services. This could strain already tight education budgets.
Attendance policies alone may not address why students skip school, such as bullying, mental health issues, or unsafe conditions. Programs must tackle deeper problems.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.