Latest action: Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 450.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Mark Warner (D-VA)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Creates new rules for digital networks and internet infrastructure in the United States.
The problem
Current internet and digital network rules may not address modern technology challenges, cybersecurity threats, and rapid changes in how Americans communicate online.
The proposal
The bill establishes frameworks for managing digital networks, likely including standards for infrastructure, security requirements, and oversight of internet service providers.
The impact
Internet users, tech companies, and service providers face new compliance requirements. Consumers may see changes in internet service quality, pricing, and privacy protections.
New standards could protect Americans from hacking and data theft. Better security rules for digital networks help safeguard personal information and critical systems.
Updated rules can ensure internet systems keep pace with current technology needs. Clear standards help networks operate more reliably nationwide.
New regulations may protect internet users from unfair practices. Standards could ensure clearer information about service quality and privacy for consumers.
Clear rules can help new internet providers enter markets more easily. This may increase choices and lower prices for consumers through increased competition.
Internet companies must spend money to follow new rules and standards. This cost may get passed to consumers through higher internet bills.
More regulation means more government involvement in internet services. Some worry this could limit innovation or give government too much control.
Without seeing full details, it is unclear how strict these rules will be. Unclear rules make it hard for companies to comply and may create confusion.
Smaller internet companies may struggle more with new compliance costs than large companies. This could force smaller providers out of business.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.