Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a national strategy to help Americans connect with each other and build stronger communities.
The problem
Many Americans feel isolated and disconnected from their communities, which can harm mental health and social wellbeing.
The proposal
Establishes a federal government plan to promote social connection through community programs and initiatives nationwide.
The impact
Americans may gain more opportunities to meet neighbors and join communities. Government may spend money on new programs.
Social connection is linked to better mental health and reduced loneliness. Programs promoting connection could help many Americans feel less isolated and improve overall wellbeing.
A national strategy can encourage local organizations to work together. This may lead to stronger neighborhoods and more civic participation across the country.
Social connection is not a partisan issue—both political parties value strong communities. This could lead to broad agreement on programs.
Promoting connection often requires coordination rather than massive spending. Government can leverage existing community organizations and volunteers.
Critics may argue social connection should be led by communities and private groups, not federal government. A national strategy could limit local flexibility.
Without knowing what programs are included, it is hard to judge effectiveness or cost. Vague strategies can waste money or fail to help.
New federal strategies often require taxpayer money. The bill may increase government spending without clear evidence programs will work.
Different communities have different needs and cultures. A national strategy might not work well in rural areas, cities, or regions with unique challenges.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.