Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Legislation to prevent sharing of people's personal information online without consent.
The problem
People's addresses, phone numbers, and other private information are being shared publicly online, putting individuals at risk of harassment, stalking, and violence.
The proposal
Creates penalties for publishing someone's personal information online with intent to enable harassment or harm, and establishes federal enforcement mechanisms.
The impact
Internet users, social media platforms, and law enforcement would be affected. Sites may need new policies; violators face potential fines or legal action.
Gives people legal protection against having their private information weaponized for harassment or violence. Creates consequences for those who publish addresses and contact details to enable attacks.
Establishes clear legal penalties for doxing, which may discourage coordinated online attacks against individuals, journalists, and public figures.
Gives federal authorities clear tools to investigate and prosecute doxing cases, potentially reducing gaps in current state laws.
Recognizes new harms created by internet technology that existing laws may not adequately cover.
Could restrict legitimate sharing of public information. Defining what counts as 'intent to harass' may be unclear and lead to censorship of protected speech.
Difficult to enforce across state lines and internationally. Prosecutors must prove harmful intent, which requires significant investigation resources.
The bill summary is unavailable, but doxing laws often struggle with defining what information is 'private' versus 'public,' creating legal uncertainty.
Social media companies may face liability for user content, increasing compliance costs and requiring new moderation systems.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.