Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Expands paid leave benefits for federal employees across the government.
The problem
Federal employees may have limited paid leave options compared to private sector workers, affecting recruitment, retention, and employee well-being.
The proposal
Creates comprehensive paid leave program for federal workers, likely including sick leave, personal leave, and family leave provisions.
The impact
Federal employees gain expanded leave benefits. Taxpayers fund increased costs. Government operations adapt to new leave policies.
Comprehensive paid leave makes federal jobs more attractive and competitive with private sector positions. This helps recruit and keep talented workers in government.
Adequate paid leave allows employees to rest, recover from illness, and handle family needs. This can reduce stress and improve overall employee wellness.
More leave options help prevent employee exhaustion and maintain productivity. Workers who take breaks return more refreshed and effective.
Paid leave supports employees managing caregiving, health issues, and personal responsibilities alongside work demands.
Expanded paid leave increases federal payroll expenses and benefits spending. Taxpayers fund these increases through government budget allocations.
More employees on leave simultaneously could disrupt government operations and services. Agencies may need to hire replacement workers or adjust schedules.
Federal employees would receive benefits many private sector workers lack, creating fairness questions about taxpayer-funded advantages.
Creating uniform paid leave policies across diverse federal agencies is administratively complex and requires significant oversight.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1607
Expressing support for the designation of September 2026 as "National Workforce Development Month".
HR 10703
Protecting Workers’ Benefits Act
S 5615
VEST Act
S 5646
Direct Seller and Real Estate Agent Harmonization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.