Latest action: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 24 - 21.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Requires displaying prices on products or walls in retail stores.
The problem
Consumers may struggle to find or understand product prices when shopping. Clear price visibility helps people make informed purchasing decisions quickly.
The proposal
The bill mandates that retailers display prices on items or nearby walls so customers can easily see what products cost before checkout.
The impact
Retail stores must change pricing systems. Shoppers gain clearer price information. Small retailers face new compliance costs.
Customers can quickly see prices while browsing. This saves time and reduces confusion at checkout. Shoppers make better purchasing decisions with clear information.
Transparent pricing prevents surprise charges at the register. Customers know exact costs upfront. This builds trust between stores and shoppers.
Visible prices let people track spending while shopping. Families on tight budgets can manage money better. Shoppers avoid overspending.
Clear pricing helps customers compare stores easily. This encourages fair pricing practices. Businesses compete on honest terms.
Stores must buy and install new pricing equipment or systems. Small retailers face expensive upgrades. Initial costs may burden struggling businesses.
Staff must maintain and update prices constantly. Errors in pricing displays could confuse customers. Stores need more employees for compliance.
Large retailers can absorb compliance costs more easily than small shops. Independent stores may struggle with new requirements. Rules favoring big business could harm competition.
The bill's exact requirements are not detailed in available information. Stores may struggle with unclear rules. Inconsistent compliance could create legal disputes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.