Latest action: Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Requires Medicare Advantage plans to disclose how they steer patients to specific doctors and hospitals.
The problem
Medicare Advantage plans may guide patients toward certain providers without full transparency, potentially affecting quality of care and patient choice.
The proposal
Mandates Medicare Advantage insurers publicly report data on provider steering practices and the criteria used to direct patient care.
The impact
Medicare beneficiaries, insurers, doctors, and hospitals face new reporting requirements and potential changes to patient referral patterns.
Seniors enrolled in Medicare Advantage would know how their insurance company decides which doctors they can see. This transparency helps patients make informed choices about their care.
When steering practices are public, less-preferred doctors and hospitals can compete better by improving service. Market transparency encourages providers to deliver better quality.
Public data reveals whether steering limits patient access to necessary specialists or high-quality providers. Regulators can then investigate potential harm to beneficiaries.
Transparency supports the principle that Medicare beneficiaries should control their own medical decisions rather than have insurers make those choices invisibly.
Insurance companies must collect, organize, and report complex data about steering practices. This creates costs that may increase premiums for beneficiaries.
Revealing steering strategies publicly could expose proprietary business practices. Insurers may argue this disadvantages them against traditional Medicare.
Detailed steering reports might inadvertently reveal personal patient information or treatment patterns. Protections may be difficult to implement while keeping data meaningful.
The bill does not specify penalties for non-compliance or false reporting. Without enforcement mechanisms, transparency requirements may not be taken seriously.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.