Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes billing standards and protections for telehealth medical services.
The problem
Telehealth patients face confusing billing practices, surprise charges, and unclear pricing from remote healthcare providers without consistent industry standards.
The proposal
Creates federal rules for telehealth billing transparency, pricing disclosure, and patient protections to standardize how remote healthcare visits are charged.
The impact
Telehealth patients, healthcare providers, and insurance companies face new billing requirements and standards affecting how remote medical services are paid for.
Patients would know telehealth prices upfront before appointments, reducing surprise bills and confusion about what they owe.
Standard billing rules help telehealth companies compete fairly since all must follow the same pricing and transparency rules.
Federal standards give patients legal protections and clear complaint processes if billing problems occur with telehealth providers.
Standardized billing helps insurance companies process telehealth claims faster and more accurately, reducing paperwork errors.
Telehealth companies must spend money updating billing systems and training staff to meet new federal requirements, especially smaller providers.
Strict billing rules may prevent telehealth companies from offering creative pricing options or discounts they currently provide to patients.
New compliance costs could be passed to patients through higher telehealth fees, making remote care more expensive.
Federal oversight requires new bureaucracy and enforcement mechanisms, which takes time and government resources to establish.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.