Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Creates federal protections against coercion and sexual abuse in specified contexts.
The problem
Current laws may not adequately address coercion and sexual abuse in certain environments or situations, leaving some victims without sufficient federal protections.
The proposal
Establishes federal standards and penalties for coercion and sexual abuse, likely defining prohibited conduct and creating enforcement mechanisms through federal law.
The impact
Affects potential victims seeking protection, law enforcement agencies enforcing new standards, and individuals subject to these federal prohibitions across multiple jurisdictions.
Creates uniform federal standards against coercion and sexual abuse nationwide. Ensures victims have consistent protections regardless of which state they live in. Provides additional legal recourse through federal courts.
Gives federal agencies authority to investigate and prosecute these crimes. Allows coordination across state lines for cases involving multiple jurisdictions. Provides resources and training for enforcement.
May include provisions for victim assistance, counseling, or compensation programs. Establishes clearer legal pathways for survivors to seek justice. Could improve reporting and prosecution rates.
Targets coercion and abuse scenarios not fully covered by current statutes. Clarifies definitions and creates specific penalties. Closes loopholes in protection mechanisms.
Expands federal criminal authority into areas traditionally handled by states. May duplicate existing state laws, creating redundant prosecutions. Could raise constitutional concerns about federalism.
Requires funding for federal agencies to enforce new provisions. States may need to adjust procedures to comply with federal standards. Law enforcement training and infrastructure updates needed.
Without seeing the full text, unclear how broadly 'coercion' and 'sexual abuse' are defined. Vague definitions could lead to inconsistent enforcement or legal challenges. May inadvertently criminalize borderline conduct.
New federal penalties could be severe, raising fairness questions. Possible impact on defendants' rights if standards are unclear. May face legal challenges on constitutionality grounds.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.