Latest action: Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill promotes U.S. leadership in creating international technology standards.
The problem
The U.S. may lose influence in setting global technology standards as other countries gain power in international standards organizations.
The proposal
Bill supports U.S. participation and leadership in developing international standards for technology, communications, and related fields.
The impact
Technology companies, government agencies, and American workers affected by how global tech standards are set and enforced worldwide.
Helps America shape technology standards globally instead of following other countries' rules. Protects American interests in how technology is designed and used worldwide.
U.S. companies benefit when standards reflect American technology and practices. Makes it easier for American businesses to compete internationally.
Supporting standards development creates work for engineers, scientists, and skilled workers. Strengthens America's technology sector and related industries.
Standards shaped by America help protect against foreign technology threats. Ensures American security interests are built into global technology rules.
Bill likely requires federal funding for standards organizations and programs. Increases government costs without guaranteed results.
Pushing American standards globally could reduce technology diversity and options. Other countries might resist American-led standards.
Other nations may see this as U.S. dominance in technology. Could create tension in international trade relationships.
Bill has no official summary yet, making it hard to assess actual costs and effects. Congress may not fully understand what they're voting on.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.