Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates federal rules for managing risks from artificial intelligence systems.
The problem
AI technology is growing rapidly without clear safety rules. Companies and government agencies need guidance on preventing AI harms.
The proposal
Establishes a federal framework requiring risk assessments, safety standards, and oversight for AI systems used in sensitive areas.
The impact
AI companies, tech workers, and government agencies must follow new rules. Users and the public may get safer AI systems.
Rules requiring safety checks help prevent AI from making bad decisions in important areas like healthcare or criminal justice. This reduces harm to everyday people.
Companies know exactly what standards they must meet instead of guessing. This levels the playing field between large and small tech firms.
Strong AI safety standards position the US as a trustworthy tech leader. This benefits American companies selling AI technology worldwide.
Requirements for responsible AI use can prevent discrimination and protect people's personal information from misuse by AI systems.
New rules and paperwork requirements may slow down how fast companies can develop and release AI products. This could hurt American tech competitiveness.
Small startups may lack resources to meet new safety standards and compliance costs. Big companies have easier access to legal help and compliance teams.
AI technology changes very quickly. Federal rules might become outdated before lawmakers can update them, making regulations ineffective.
Government agencies may lack expertise to properly oversee complex AI systems. Vague standards could lead to inconsistent enforcement.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.