Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents the military from turning off Electronic Combat Air Bases.
The problem
The bill addresses concerns that military leadership might deactivate Electronic Combat Air Bases (ECABs), which could affect national defense capabilities and military readiness.
The proposal
The bill prohibits the deactivation of Electronic Combat Air Bases without specific congressional authorization or approval.
The impact
Military operations, defense readiness, and Congress are affected. The bill limits executive decisions about military infrastructure.
Maintains Electronic Combat Air Bases in operational status, ensuring the military keeps important defensive capabilities available. This protects national security infrastructure from being shut down without careful review.
Requires Congress to approve any deactivation decisions. This ensures elected representatives have a say in major military infrastructure changes rather than leaving it solely to executive branch officials.
Prevents disruption to ongoing military programs and personnel stationed at these bases. Maintaining continuous operation provides stability for defense personnel and operations.
Restricts the Department of Defense's ability to make quick decisions about military base operations based on current strategic needs. Military leaders may need flexibility to reorganize resources efficiently.
May require maintaining bases that the military considers unnecessary or inefficient. This could lock in defense spending on facilities the Pentagon believes could be consolidated or closed.
Requiring congressional approval could delay important military decisions if Congress cannot reach agreement. Time-sensitive operational needs might be hampered by legislative processes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.