Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill requires screening programs to detect Type 1 diabetes early in Americans.
The problem
Type 1 diabetes often goes undetected until serious symptoms appear. Early detection could help people manage the disease better and prevent complications.
The proposal
The bill establishes screening programs for Type 1 diabetes. It likely funds testing and education initiatives to identify cases sooner.
The impact
Patients with Type 1 diabetes, healthcare providers, and the healthcare system gain resources for earlier detection and management of the condition.
Screening programs catch diabetes before serious complications like diabetic ketoacidosis develop. Early treatment helps patients live longer, healthier lives with fewer emergencies.
Finding diabetes early means fewer hospital admissions for severe symptoms. This saves money for patients, insurance companies, and hospitals.
People diagnosed early have time to learn about managing their condition. They can plan their treatment and lifestyle changes before getting very sick.
Screening programs generate data about Type 1 diabetes patterns across the country. This helps researchers understand the disease better and develop new treatments.
Setting up screening programs costs taxpayer money. The bill may require significant federal funding without clear cost limits specified.
Screening tests sometimes show diabetes when a person doesn't actually have it. This causes unnecessary worry and follow-up testing for some patients.
Screening programs may not reach all communities equally. Rural or low-income areas might have fewer screening opportunities than wealthy regions.
Large-scale screening creates databases of patient health information. Some people worry about how this personal data is stored and used.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.