Latest action: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Gives immigrant children the right to lawyers in court cases.
The problem
Immigrant children often face court cases without legal representation, making it difficult for them to understand proceedings or present their cases fairly.
The proposal
Requires the government to provide or pay for lawyers for immigrant children in immigration court proceedings.
The impact
Immigrant children would have legal representation in court. Costs would increase for government. Immigration courts would handle cases differently.
Children would have lawyers to explain court procedures and protect their rights. This ensures they understand what is happening and can present their cases properly. Children deserve the same legal protections as adults.
Children with lawyers may get fairer decisions because they have someone advocating for them. Lawyers can find legal solutions the children might not know about. This could prevent wrongful deportations.
Organized legal representation might make cases move faster through courts. Lawyers know court rules and procedures that speed things up. This gets cases resolved sooner.
Children cannot fully understand complex legal systems or advocate for themselves. Providing lawyers ensures vulnerable youth are not harmed by unfair proceedings. This protects those who cannot protect themselves.
Paying for lawyers for all immigrant children would cost taxpayers significant money. The government would need to hire many lawyers or contract with firms. Budgets would need to be increased substantially.
Adding lawyers to the system might slow down court cases initially. Courts would need time to handle more complex presentations. This could delay final decisions and deportations.
Some argue providing lawyers might encourage more illegal immigration attempts. Families might believe their children will get protected status through courts. This could increase border crossing attempts.
There may not be enough immigration lawyers available to serve all children. Training new lawyers takes time and money. Rural areas might have particular difficulty finding qualified attorneys.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10740
To designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
HR 10656
Nicholas Douglas Quets Border Travel Safety Act
S 5521
Ukrainian Adjustment Act of 2026
S 5490
A bill to designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.