Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Increases funding and resources for school counselors in elementary and secondary schools.
The problem
Many schools lack enough counselors to help students with academic, personal, and mental health needs. Students need more support.
The proposal
The bill provides funding to hire more school counselors and improve counseling services in public elementary and secondary schools.
The impact
Students gain access to more counseling support. Schools must allocate resources to hire counselors. Teachers have more support with student welfare.
More counselors mean students can get help with anxiety, depression, and personal problems. Early support prevents serious issues from developing. Students perform better academically when mentally healthy.
Counselors identify troubled students early and intervene. This can prevent violence and discipline problems. Schools become safer environments overall.
More counselors can help students plan for college, careers, and life. Students get personalized guidance instead of seeing a counselor once yearly. More students finish high school and pursue education.
Teachers focus on teaching when counselors handle student problems. Teachers spend less time on non-academic issues. Classroom quality improves.
Expanding counseling programs nationwide is expensive. Taxpayers must fund it through federal spending. Other priorities may lose funding.
Not enough trained counselors exist to fill new positions. Hiring qualified people will be difficult. Schools may struggle to find staff.
Federal funding may come with strict requirements schools must follow. Schools lose flexibility to design counseling programs for their communities. States and districts prefer local decision-making.
Bill details are unclear about which counseling services work best. School counseling shows mixed results in research. Money might not improve outcomes significantly.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.