Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill honors deaf educators Alice Cogswell and Anne Sullivan Macy through federal recognition and support.
The problem
Deaf education and deaf cultural history lack sufficient federal recognition and support. Alice Cogswell and Anne Sullivan Macy made major contributions to deaf education but remain underknown.
The proposal
The bill likely establishes federal recognition, funding, or programs honoring these educators and advancing deaf education initiatives, though specific details are unavailable.
The impact
Deaf students, educators, and communities may gain increased federal support. General public awareness of deaf history and education may improve.
Alice Cogswell and Anne Sullivan Macy made significant contributions to deaf education. Federal recognition celebrates their legacy and raises public awareness of deaf history.
The bill may provide funding or resources for deaf education initiatives. This could improve educational outcomes for deaf and hard-of-hearing students nationally.
Recognizing deaf educators helps mainstream society understand deaf culture and contributions. This can reduce stigma and improve inclusion efforts.
Memorializing these figures ensures their teaching methods and philosophies remain documented. Future educators can learn from their approaches and innovations.
The bill's actual funding requirements are unknown. Without details, Congress cannot assess fiscal costs or evaluate budget priorities.
Honoring specific individuals may not directly address broader deaf education challenges. Broader systemic reforms might have greater impact on student outcomes.
Existing programs may already address deaf education and historical recognition. New federal programs could duplicate efforts or create administrative overhead.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.