Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Allows Education Secretary to extend paperwork reduction waivers for schools serving students with disabilities.
The problem
Schools serving students with disabilities face heavy paperwork requirements. Paperwork reduction waivers help schools reduce this burden. Waivers may expire, forcing schools back to full paperwork.
The proposal
The bill gives the Secretary of Education power to extend paperwork reduction waivers that help schools reduce administrative paperwork requirements.
The impact
School districts and special education programs may have less paperwork to handle. Students with disabilities and their families may see improved services through reduced administrative costs.
Schools spend less time on forms and more time helping students. This can free up resources for classroom instruction and student support.
Schools serving students with disabilities face complex paperwork. Extending waivers helps these schools manage costs and focus on student needs.
Giving the Secretary authority to extend waivers allows quick adjustments. Schools don't have to wait for new laws each time a waiver expires.
Less paperwork means schools need fewer staff for administrative tasks. Schools can redirect money toward education and student services.
Paperwork helps track whether schools follow rules. Reducing it might make it harder to ensure schools are following laws protecting students.
Congress normally makes these decisions. Giving the Secretary authority to extend waivers shifts power away from elected lawmakers.
The bill doesn't specify which waivers or how long extensions can last. This vagueness could lead to confusion or misuse.
Paperwork requirements exist to document that students receive required services. Reducing paperwork might make it harder to verify students are actually getting help.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.