Latest action: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 5 - 4.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Limits lawmakers' ability to make predictions about future events or outcomes.
The problem
Lawmakers may make public predictions about future events that prove inaccurate, potentially misleading constituents or affecting public confidence in government decision-making.
The proposal
Restricts members of Congress from making official predictions or forecasts about future political, economic, or social outcomes in their official capacity.
The impact
Affects Congress members' public communications. May limit constituent guidance on future policy outcomes. Could restrict transparency about lawmakers' views on future developments.
Prevents lawmakers from making public predictions that might be wrong, which could mislead constituents. This helps keep government statements more reliable and honest. People would be less confused by failed predictions.
When officials stop making wrong predictions, people may trust government more. Fewer embarrassing failed forecasts means less damage to public confidence. This could strengthen respect for institutions.
Forces lawmakers to focus on facts and current situations rather than guessing about the future. Official statements would be simpler and more straightforward. Citizens would know exactly what is being said now versus speculation.
Lawmakers often discuss how proposed policies might affect the future. This restriction could make it harder to debate bills and their expected impacts. Citizens might lose important information about policy consequences.
When lawmakers cannot discuss future outlooks, constituents get less information about government plans. This could make it harder for voters to understand what their representatives are trying to accomplish. Less communication could hurt informed voting.
It's hard to define what counts as a prediction versus analysis or opinion. Lawmakers might argue they were explaining consequences, not predicting. This could lead to confusion about what the law actually prohibits.
Leaders often describe future goals and possibilities to inspire action. Restricting this could reduce their ability to communicate vision for policy change. Citizens might lose inspiration about what government plans to achieve.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.