Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires courts to fully retry facts in cases where agencies impose penalties on individuals or companies.
The problem
Currently, courts give agencies significant deference when reviewing their decisions. This bill addresses concerns that agencies can impose sanctions without full judicial scrutiny of the underlying facts.
The proposal
Amends the Administrative Procedure Act to require de novo review of facts when agencies impose sanctions, meaning courts must independently evaluate all facts rather than deferring to agency findings.
The impact
Affects individuals and businesses facing agency penalties. Changes how courts review agency decisions. Increases judicial involvement in regulatory enforcement actions across federal agencies.
Gives individuals and businesses a real chance to have their case fully heard in court. Courts will independently check agency facts instead of accepting agency decisions without question. This protects people from potentially unfair sanctions.
Limits agencies' ability to impose penalties without strong judicial oversight. Requires agencies to prove their case to an independent judge. Makes agencies more accountable for their enforcement decisions.
De novo review means courts examine all evidence fresh, not assuming agencies are correct. Creates more balanced legal proceedings. Treats agency decisions like other legal matters in court.
Requiring courts to retry all facts takes much more time and resources. Cases that could be handled quickly now require full trials. Backlog in courts could grow significantly.
Taxpayers pay for longer court proceedings and more judicial resources. Individuals and companies must spend more on legal representation. Federal court system needs additional funding.
Agencies may struggle to enforce rules if every penalty faces full court challenge. Environmental, safety, and financial protections could be harder to enforce. Businesses might ignore agency rules knowing penalties are easily challenged.
Existing law gives agencies reasonable deference because they have expertise. This change removes that deference for sanctions. May conflict with how other Administrative Procedure Act provisions work.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.