Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes guidelines for federal agencies to prepare government data for artificial intelligence use.
The problem
Federal agencies hold valuable data but lack consistent standards for preparing it for AI applications. This creates inefficiency and missed opportunities to use AI for better government services.
The proposal
The bill sets guidelines requiring federal agencies to organize, format, and document data in ways that make it ready for AI systems. Agencies must follow these standards when managing public and internal data.
The impact
Federal agencies, technology companies, researchers, and the public are affected. It could improve government efficiency and AI research, but requires agencies to invest in data preparation.
AI-ready data could help federal agencies serve citizens faster and more accurately. Agencies could use AI to process applications, detect fraud, and improve programs.
Consistent data standards would help researchers and companies develop better AI tools. This could boost the U.S. technology industry and economic competitiveness.
Though agencies must invest upfront, AI-ready data reduces future costs by automating tasks. Agencies spend less money on manual work and repetitive processes.
Standardized data formats make government data easier for the public to access and understand. Citizens can better track how government agencies work.
Federal agencies must spend money reformatting existing data and training staff. Small agencies with limited budgets may struggle with these costs.
Preparing data for AI could expose sensitive personal information if not handled carefully. Hackers might target government data as AI systems become more attractive.
The bill currently has no official summary, making it difficult to know exact requirements. Agencies might interpret guidelines differently, creating confusion.
Automating government work with AI could eliminate some federal jobs. Workers in data processing and administrative roles may be most affected.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.