Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill establishes uniform Medicaid standards across all states for consistent benefits.
The problem
States set different Medicaid rules and benefits, creating unequal healthcare access depending on where people live.
The proposal
Creates federal standards requiring all states to provide equal Medicaid coverage levels and eligibility requirements.
The impact
Low-income people, states, and healthcare providers face changes in Medicaid coverage, costs, and program administration.
People would receive the same Medicaid benefits no matter which state they live in. This removes unfair differences between states with rich and poor programs.
People moving between states wouldn't lose coverage or face confusion about benefits. Healthcare choices become simpler and more predictable nationwide.
One federal standard reduces paperwork and complexity for hospitals and doctors dealing with multiple state rules. Programs become cheaper to operate.
Guarantees minimum coverage everywhere protects vulnerable people in states with weaker programs. Creates a baseline of protection for low-income families.
States with basic programs would need to spend more to meet higher federal standards. This increases state budgets and taxes significantly.
States lose ability to design programs for their specific needs and populations. Local solutions get replaced by one-size-fits-all federal rules.
Uniform high standards could dramatically increase federal Medicaid spending nationwide. This strains the federal budget and taxpayers.
States with different infrastructure may struggle to meet new requirements quickly. Transition could disrupt coverage during implementation period.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.